V: ABC Cancels Skywriting Campaign, Releases Extended Preview

V skywritingIt was recently announced that ABC was going to use some skywriting to promote their upcoming remake of the 1980’s NBC mini-series and TV show, V. The plan was for airplanes to draw giant red V’s across the sky at over 25 landmarks across the country and keep doing it until the show debuts on November 3rd.

Well, Lisa de Moraes, a reporter for The Washington Post, wrote an article about the promotion and described the amount of pollution that the campaign would add to the atmosphere. According to estimated figures, the skywriting would use more than 400 gallons of fuel, and add 800 grams of lead and three tons of CO2 to the atmosphere.

That may not seem like a lot but it doesn’t exactly line up with the ecological stance of Disney, ABC’s parent company. Earlier this year, the house of mouse promised to reduce its environmental footprint with plans to cut its fuel emissions in half by the year 2012.

ABC has now decided to rethink the whole idea and has cancelled its skywriting plans. According to a spokesperson from the network, they’ll spend the money in other ways.

One aspect of the V promotion is apparently to release an extended preview of the first nine and a half minutes of the series. The network has been airing numerous commercials to entice viewers to tune in but ABC is hoping this will really whet people’s appetite.

What do you think? Was ABC smart in pulling the skywriting promotion or just being too politically correct?

Canceled and renewed TV show

4 Comments · Read them below or add one

  1. WilliamBoone says

    Can you say “Earth: Final Conflict” all over again? Let’s see, aliens landing in all parts of the world, claiming peace, there’s FBI agents involved and a resistance movement.

    Yep, sounds like E:FC to me.

    • Chrispy says

      The only trouble is the original V was out long before E: FC so I gues E: FC is a rip off of V.

  2. Gerald says

    Wow. I mean, just wow. Let’s change Disney for Las Vegas, or LA or New York or… better yet, Hawaii. How can any city with attractive destinations ever have any ecological stance of any kind? “Stay home. Protect the environment. Oh, and don’t buy stuff we sell.”

  3. JP says

    How can Disney claim to have an eclogical stance of any kind, given the number of people they entice to their theme parks every year, most of whom will get there by plane? Not to mention the impact their merchandising must surely have on the environment…Seems to me like a cop out on the part of ABC – or could be that they don;t have faith in the series being a success, and don;t want to spend any amount of money generating interest in it.

Leave a Comment

Your comment may need approval from a moderator before it appears. We review comments to weed out spam, duplicate postings and personal attacks. We welcome constructive discussion.